it proves everythin! romeo and juliet are the best thing ever invented even if they arent real. the point of the story wasnt romeo and juliets love for eachother. it was to prove that love can exsist in anyone you just have to be willin. that's what i think at least. it may not actually be the point but...that's what i feel!
Actually, their love only lasted like what.. a day? a couple days? (haven't read it in a while) Then, they died. It could have easily been teenage infatuation. Regardless- they don't EXIST! I could write a famous play about a hippopotamus falling in love with a dishcloth... does that mean that it proves that hippo/dishcloth relationships can work if they really love each other? No. It's false.
Actually, I don't at all, and that's very unfair of you to assume that. But that's not a concern of mine, anyways.
I'm merely stating that people should base things off of false stories. That's why I see girls all the time who actually think there's a prince charming and relationships don't have problems and life is hunky-dory... because they believe in STORIES. Stories don't have to have any basis in truth.. and therefore people should say that just because somebody made it up, it "proves" anything. Let's snap out of La-la land, kiddos. You want examples of "proven" love? Look for real, tangible human beings (or species of your choice.. it's still the same, essentially.)
i don't assume but based on what u write is what i base my knowledge on :) Some people want to live in fantasy because it builds a fundamental environment and teaches you about morals, thats the point of fiction stories, you learn and can approach reality at a different angle.
Right, that's called an assumption.
Regardless of what fantasy "builds", the fact is that it's false. It does not teach true life lessons because it contains improbable outcomes. And I don't see the morals taught in typical fairy tales or even Shakespeare.. mostly I see a lot of hidden misogynistic properties, I.E. in fairy tales, the woman is typically cast as a damsel in distress who needs a prince or other male figure to save her, she is weak, dependent, and, of course, beautiful. This sets a terrible precedent for young girls, teaching them that they need a "prince charming" to be happy, making them unable to be self sufficient and also to have unrealistic expectations about both life and relationships, and that they have to be beautiful to get this prince charming. This leads to unhappiness later in life. And to touch on the Shakespeare factor, many of his leading ladies of his plays have been cast as, truly, shrews. Lady Macbeth, anyone?
I'm also not seeing the "different angle" you're speaking of, maybe you could explain it to me.
perhaps, the morals are for you to figure out. Its not hard to read between the lines and discover its hidden meaning.Maybe its a bad example but most girls know that its a cold world, we all have a fantasy world. Don't you have a fantasy world of your own or is it just plain reality? This world is based on dreams, first we dream and than turn it into a reality. Flying is one of them. Now we have planes to use to fly. We want to travel to space. Now we have astronauts.
Take The Hunchback of Notre Dame, its a fairytale and the guy who falls with in love knows he is ugly. Also she is not in love with him but another man. At the end of the tale he did not found love but good friends forever