Would Edward be better with or without Fangs?

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Kim on November 4, 2008 at 1:22am

no way! he doesnt need them

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Selene on November 8, 2008 at 12:40am

I think he would be hot as....yeah with the fangs. I know that it would be harder for them to go into public though with them so if it was some thing that happend only when the time called for it that would be fine. But then again there is the time in Biology Class when he first meets bella...I mean he could have been clinching his jaw down to keep his fangs concealed....humm the possiblitys... (sorry for my spelling) I also think in the last book that it would have been funny if he had not only ripped out big chucks of the head board but has also bitten some of it off. you know when they were on Isle Esme

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Selena Let the dream begin, let your darker side give in on November 18, 2008 at 4:52am

yea, i reckon vampires have snake like fangs, that sort of fold from the top of there mouth? so i think hese sorta like both. :)

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Lisa Hill on November 26, 2008 at 5:51am

fangs or no fangs big deal ...yeah fangs are sexy and if they were retractable kissing would be easier...but look at it this way...the way stephanie portrays vampires makes them seem like an actual possibility more than the no reflection casting, religious symbol loathing, stalking at night, bursting into flames in the sun type.
Makes the possibility of "vampires" more believable! And I say hooray to that!

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Ali on November 26, 2008 at 7:07pm

I think Edward needs to be with the fangs because thats just who he is and he wouldn't be the same if he wasn't a vampire.......... But it doesn't matter because the vampires in twilight don't have fangs

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Gwen Morte on April 7, 2009 at 5:12pm

I agree. That's the main reason I like the books, because she makes everything seem possible. No supernatural, hooky-spooky stuff. Yes, it's just creepy enough (like the Volturi) but realistic enough that we can believe in vampires.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Bleeding mask-Death's discuise on November 30, 2008 at 4:19pm

NO.Hes hot already don`t put something on him that`ll make him look stupid.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Sexy VAMP Nelz on December 7, 2008 at 2:53am

I'm still really bummed by the fact that the dude aint got no fangs! Vampires without fangs are like Licans without fur...Oh well, at least he's hot.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Isabella on December 20, 2008 at 12:09pm

With yes he wood be hotter with fangs...

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by alekhya iyengar on April 4, 2009 at 12:55pm

well do u like those disturbing fangs when ur about to kiss a vampire??? hope this answers ur question...well fangs are a must....for the sex appeal....but its not necessary for them to grow....

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by stacy on April 7, 2009 at 3:13am

I like vampires with fangs, but I think Edward looks good either way.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Gwen Morte on April 7, 2009 at 5:10pm

Well, I do kinda think that Meyer's vampires are kinda lacking in vampire-like qualities. But for me, I like edward without the fangs. NO transforming into giant bats, or any crap like that either.

▶ Reply to This

• First
• Previous
• Next
• Last