In the book I never actually got why the vamps sparkled... I mean - it's just to fairy tale. Vampires are supposed to be wicked, evil - not like "look at me! look at me! I sparkle like a pretty little girl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" Hmmmm, it just seems off.
lmao
i dnt even like glitter so mayb thats y i dnt like..
but there have been vamps that havent been so wicked i mean they've had a wicked side but they arent completely evil but i mean i always thought of the way they sparkled as like mayb the way ppl glisten when they have sweat over their body idk but yeah they did it over the top in the movie like they dropped a bucket of glitter on him
They should of totally chose someone better looking! The edward they chose looked lazy and dead which vampires are supposed to look like, but he looked more drowsy and retarded. I can't believe i've found other people that hate edward in the movie series, my friends are always like " OMFG HES SOO HOTT!!!!" and I'm just sitting there throwing up. ( no offense xD ) Oh and I thought that they chose Bella well. She matched the books description and thats what I imagined her to be like. And yes I agree with all of you, the movie made the series suck bad, I mean remember that random part when Bella tripped over on the ice whilst walking out of her dad's house? I personally think that was pretty random.
Cass xx
I agree they could have found a much better Edward. That Pattinson dude didn'teven have coppery hair like he wassupposed to it was... BROWN not that there's anything wrongwith brown but yeah.......:)
Honestly, there would have never been a perfect Edward. He's fictional! Oh well though. I still think Rob Pattinson is gorgeous, even if he doesn't look like Edward. I had a crush on him years ago when he was just Cedric Diggory. :)
i dont think hes cute,and i dont think that any of the actors in twilight should of been in the movie,they should of picked ppl with more acting experiance.they should of just left the books just that,as books.